Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A500
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
63 Imaging
52 Features
52 Overall
52
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 630g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Announced August 2009
- Replacement is Sony A560
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A500 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony A500, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the A500 (12MP) is pretty close but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and A500 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-M1 was brought out 5 years later than the A500 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the WG-M1 grades against the A500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A500. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony A500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony A500
WG-M1 | A500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | August 2009 | More recent by 62 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A500 over the Ricoh WG-M1
A500 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A500
WG-M1 | A500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A500 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with physical dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony A500 has specifications of 137mm x 104mm x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") along with a weight of 630 grams (1.39 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony A500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 and the A500.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and A500 is 91 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and A500.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Ricoh WG-M1 will render extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A500 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2009-08-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4272 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 800 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 630 grams (1.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 772 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 520 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $2,000 | $638 |