Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A700
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
58 Imaging
51 Features
58 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 768g - 142 x 105 x 80mm
- Launched December 2007
- Earlier Model is Konica Minolta 7D
- Later Model is Sony A77
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A700 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A700, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the A700 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and A700 (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was released 6 years later than the A700 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A700 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the WG-M1 scores vs the A700 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A700 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A700. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony A700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony A700
WG-M1 | A700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | December 2007 | More recent by 82 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A700 over the Ricoh WG-M1
A700 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 115k | Crisper screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A700
WG-M1 | A700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony A700 has proportions of 142mm x 105mm x 80mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 768 grams (1.69 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A700 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-M1 and the A700.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and A700 is 91 and 58 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A700 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at specifications. The visual below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and A700.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Ricoh WG-M1 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A700 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A700 |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2007-12-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4272 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 115 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, rear curtain, Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 768 grams (1.69 pounds) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 142 x 105 x 80mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 581 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | Dual |
Launch price | $2,000 | $1,000 |