Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A900
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31


54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Launched October 2008
- Successor is Sony A99

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A900 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A900, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) provide different sensor sizes.

The WG-M1 was announced 5 years after the A900 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WG-M1 scores vs the A900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony A900
WG-M1 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | ![]() | October 2008 | Newer by 72 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Ricoh WG-M1
A900 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A900
WG-M1 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the A900.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and A900 is 91 and 54 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The image here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and A900.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-M1 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A900 will provide greater detail with its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6048 x 4032 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 1.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 30s |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 895 grams (1.97 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 880 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | One | Two |
Retail pricing | $2,000 | $2,736 |