Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31


89 Imaging
56 Features
69 Overall
61
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Announced October 2011
- Older Model is Sony NEX-5
- Newer Model is Sony NEX-5R

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the NEX-5N (16MP) is very similar but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NEX-5N (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.

The WG-M1 was announced 2 years later than the NEX-5N and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-M1 matches up against the NEX-5N when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha NEX-5N. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony NEX-5N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony NEX-5N
WG-M1 | NEX-5N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | ![]() | October 2011 | Fresher by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5N over the Ricoh WG-M1
NEX-5N | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+805k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony NEX-5N
WG-M1 | NEX-5N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 features physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5N has sizing of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 and the NEX-5N.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and NEX-5N is 91 and 89 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and NEX-5N.
As you have seen, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-M1 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-5N will offer you extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 will have an edge in sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5N |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-09-12 | 2011-10-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 115k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | Tilt Up 80°, Down 45° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 77 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1079 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 460 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $2,000 | $550 |