Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
89 Imaging
56 Features
69 Overall
61
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Announced October 2011
- Older Model is Sony NEX-5
- Newer Model is Sony NEX-5R
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the NEX-5N (16MP) is very similar but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NEX-5N (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-M1 was announced 2 years later than the NEX-5N and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-M1 matches up against the NEX-5N when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha NEX-5N. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony NEX-5N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony NEX-5N
WG-M1 | NEX-5N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | October 2011 | Fresher by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5N over the Ricoh WG-M1
NEX-5N | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 115k | Sharper display (+805k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony NEX-5N
WG-M1 | NEX-5N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 features physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5N has sizing of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 and the NEX-5N.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and NEX-5N is 91 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and NEX-5N.
As you have seen, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-M1 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-5N will offer you extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5N Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5N |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-09-12 | 2011-10-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 115k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | Tilt Up 80°, Down 45° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 77 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1079 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 460 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $2,000 | $550 |