Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
89 Imaging
56 Features
76 Overall
64
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Announced August 2012
- Replaced the Sony NEX-5N
- Newer Model is Sony NEX-5T
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the NEX-5R (16MP) is fairly close but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NEX-5R (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-M1 was introduced 2 years later than the NEX-5R and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-M1 grades versus the NEX-5R in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony NEX-5R
| WG-M1 | NEX-5R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 | August 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Ricoh WG-M1
| NEX-5R | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 115k | Sharper display (+805k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony NEX-5R
| WG-M1 | NEX-5R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5R has specifications of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the NEX-5R.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and NEX-5R is 91 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through technical specs. The visual below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and NEX-5R.
As you can tell, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-M1 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony NEX-5R will result in extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 276 grams (0.61 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 910 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 330 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $2,000 | $750 |