Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Announced August 2012
- Replaced the Sony NEX-5N
- Newer Model is Sony NEX-5T
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the NEX-5R (16MP) is fairly close but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NEX-5R (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-M1 was introduced 2 years later than the NEX-5R and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-M1 grades versus the NEX-5R in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony NEX-5R
WG-M1 | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | August 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Ricoh WG-M1
NEX-5R | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 115k | Sharper display (+805k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony NEX-5R
WG-M1 | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5R has specifications of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the NEX-5R.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and NEX-5R is 91 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through technical specs. The visual below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and NEX-5R.
As you can tell, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-M1 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony NEX-5R will result in extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 800 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 276 grams (0.61 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 910 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 330 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-65 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $2,000 | $750 |