Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
![Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-M1/Ricoh-WG-M1-front.jpg)
![Sony Alpha NEX-5T front Sony Alpha NEX-5T front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Alpha-NEX-5T/Sony-NEX-5T-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-5R
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony NEX-5T, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the NEX-5T (16MP) is pretty close but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NEX-5T (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The WG-M1 was unveiled 13 months later than the NEX-5T which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5T being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the WG-M1 grades vs the NEX-5T for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Alpha NEX-5T. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony NEX-5T Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony NEX-5T
WG-M1 | NEX-5T | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | ![]() | August 2013 | More recent by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5T over the Ricoh WG-M1
NEX-5T | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony NEX-5T
WG-M1 | NEX-5T |
---|
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5T has specifications of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony NEX-5T in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 and the NEX-5T.
![Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-M1-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-5T-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and NEX-5T is 91 and 89 respectively.
![Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-M1-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-5T-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The photograph below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and NEX-5T.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 with its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony NEX-5T will provide you with greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
![Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Ricoh-WG-M1-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-5T-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and ViewFinder
![Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Ricoh-WG-M1-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-5T-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-5T Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5T | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5T |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2013-08-27 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Cross focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | Tilt Up 180° Down 50° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (ISO100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 276g (0.61 lb) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1015 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 330 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes ((10/2 sec. delay), Self-timer (Cont.) (with 10 sec. delay; 3/5 exposures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $2,000 | $400 |