Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
- Replaced the Sony NEX-3
- New Model is Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony NEX-C3, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the NEX-C3 (16MP) is relatively close but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-M1 was revealed 3 years after the NEX-C3 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the NEX-C3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony NEX-C3
WG-M1 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2014 | ![]() | August 2011 | More modern by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh WG-M1
NEX-C3 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony NEX-C3
WG-M1 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got outside measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has proportions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony NEX-C3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-M1 versus the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7933/f7933e712d8cf7555d5c5ea6efcf1a130367ffd8" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and NEX-C3 is 91 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8b0/2d8b08cd99fc2e0967657fd62c5d646bc622b14c" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The pic here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and NEX-C3.
All in all, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-M1 with its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Sony NEX-C3 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher WG-M1 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e8b/77e8bf31146bf51e4a63dd96ae667da9edb1ea46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408e9/408e9a162b9f58faf73cee00acca655e3f3ef267" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 800 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 1.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 400 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-65 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $2,000 | $343 |