Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-F3
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Announced August 2012
- Older Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Successor is Sony NEX-3N
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-F3, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is relatively well matched but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-M1 was revealed 2 years later than the NEX-F3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the WG-M1 scores against the NEX-F3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony NEX-F3
| WG-M1 | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | August 2012 | Fresher by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| NEX-F3 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony NEX-F3
| WG-M1 | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has dimensions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-F3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-M1 and the NEX-F3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and NEX-F3 is 91 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The photograph here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and NEX-F3.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-M1 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-F3 will give you extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2012-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 314g (0.69 lb) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 470 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-65 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $2,000 | $470 |