Clicky

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony QX1

Portability
91
Imaging
38
Features
22
Overall
31
Ricoh WG-M1 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
62
Features
48
Overall
56

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Revealed September 2014
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony QX1 Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony QX1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Lens-style by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The WG-M1 was revealed within a month of the QX1 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the WG-M1 scores vs the QX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony QX1

 WG-M1 QX1 
Screen dimension1.5""Bigger screen (+1.5")
Screen resolution115k0kSharper screen (+115k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Ricoh WG-M1

 QX1 WG-M1 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony QX1

 WG-M1 QX1 
RevealedSeptember 2014September 2014Same age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony QX1 has specifications of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony QX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the QX1.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and QX1 is 91 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and QX1.

As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony QX1 will produce more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography information
Sony QX1 Portrait photography information
29
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
65
you can focus manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-M1
Street photography with Sony QX1
52
environment sealing
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
low maximum ISO (800)
69
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
features touch to focus
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
more heavy than average (216g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 as a Sports photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Sports photography camera
37
decent megapixels (14MP)
environment sealing
great battery life (350 CIPA)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
56
MP count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
good battery life (440 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh WG-M1
Travel photography with Sony QX1
64
great battery life (350 CIPA)
environment sealing
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
good battery life (440 per charge)
features touch to focus
MP count good (20MP)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than average (216g)
does not posses selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Landscape photography camera
35
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
great battery life (350 shots)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (1.5")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (800)
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
63
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
MP count good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (440 shots)
screen is small ( inches)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging advice
Sony QX1 Vlogging advice
26
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
lack of external microphone socket
32
touchscreen functionality
has face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
missing microphone socket
more heavy than average (216g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony QX1
 Ricoh WG-M1Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh WG-M1 Sony Alpha QX1
Class Waterproof Lens-style
Revealed 2014-09-12 2014-09-03
Physical type Compact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4320 x 3240 5456 x 3632
Maximum native ISO 800 16000
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range (1×) -
Maximum aperture f/2.8 -
Crop factor 5.8 1.6
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 1.5 inch -
Resolution of display 115 thousand dots 0 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed - 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed - 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes no built-in flash Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190 grams (0.42 lbs) 216 grams (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 440 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID DB-65 NP-FW50
Self timer - Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage microSD/microSDHC, internal microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $2,000 $500