Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony a3500
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Launched March 2014
- Previous Model is Sony A3000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony a3500 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony a3500, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and a3500 (20MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and a3500 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-M1 was introduced 6 months after the a3500 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-M1 matches up vs the a3500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Alpha a3500. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony a3500
| WG-M1 | a3500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| a3500 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony a3500
| WG-M1 | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | March 2014 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with outside dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony a3500 has sizing of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony a3500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-M1 against the a3500.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and a3500 is 91 and 69 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and a3500.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-M1 having a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Sony a3500 will offer you extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2014-03-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 411 gr (0.91 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 470 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-65 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $2,000 | $398 |