Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6300
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Succeeded the Sony A6000
- New Model is Sony A6500
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6300 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A6300, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-M1 was announced 16 months before the A6300 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the WG-M1 grades against the A6300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Alpha a6300. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony A6300
WG-M1 | A6300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
A6300 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | September 2014 | More recent by 16 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 115k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A6300
WG-M1 | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers physical measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A6300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-M1 vs the A6300.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and A6300 is 91 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The photograph below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and A6300.
All in all, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sony A6300 will offer greater detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older WG-M1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2016-02-03 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 800 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 404g (0.89 pounds) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 400 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $2,000 | $889 |