Clicky

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6400

Portability
91
Imaging
38
Features
22
Overall
31
Ricoh WG-M1 front
 
Sony Alpha a6400 front
Portability
83
Imaging
69
Features
88
Overall
76

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Revealed September 2014
Sony A6400
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 102400)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
  • Announced January 2019
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6400 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony A6400, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The WG-M1 was manufactured 5 years before the A6400 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-M1 scores against the A6400 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

				

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony A6400

 WG-M1 A6400 

Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Ricoh WG-M1

 A6400 WG-M1 
AnnouncedJanuary 2019September 2014More recent by 52 months
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"1.5"Larger display (+1.5")
Display resolution922k115kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A6400

 WG-M1 A6400 

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony A6400 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony A6400 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the A6400.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6400 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and A6400 is 91 and 83 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and A6400.

As you can see, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sony A6400 will produce more detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The older WG-M1 will be behind in sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography details
Sony A6400 Portrait photography details
29
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
81
you can focus manually
good resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography advice
Sony A6400 Street photography advice
52
weather proof
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
max ISO too low (800)
81
has a tilting screen
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
includes touch focus
weather sealing
very good ISO range (32,000)
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography highlights
Sony A6400 Sports photography highlights
37
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather proof
better than average battery pack (350 CIPA)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
76
good resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
weather sealing
has phase detect autofocus
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography highlights
Sony A6400 Travel photography highlights
64
better than average battery pack (350 CIPA)
weather proof
good megapixels (14MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
87
weather sealing
connects via bluetooth
includes touch focus
good resolution (24 megapixels)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography info
Sony A6400 Landscape photography info
35
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather proof
better than average battery pack (350 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (1.5 inch)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (800)
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
80
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3")
good resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
very good ISO range (32,000)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging factors
Sony A6400 Vlogging factors
26
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
missing external mic port
80
screen is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
has external mic port
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A6400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A6400
 Ricoh WG-M1Sony Alpha a6400
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh WG-M1 Sony Alpha a6400
Category Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2014-09-12 2019-01-15
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 800 32000
Highest enhanced ISO - 102400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 425
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range (1×) -
Highest aperture f/2.8 -
Amount of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 1.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 115 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Min shutter speed - 30 secs
Max shutter speed - 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames per second 11.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings no built-in flash Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 190g (0.42 lb) 403g (0.89 lb)
Physical dimensions 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 83
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.6
DXO Low light score not tested 1431
Other
Battery life 350 photos 410 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model DB-65 NP-FW50
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage microSD/microSDHC, internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant)
Storage slots One One
Retail price $2,000 $898