Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony H300
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony H300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Revealed February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony H300 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony H300, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and H300 (20MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-M1 was brought out 8 months later than the H300 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the H300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony H300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony H300
| WG-M1 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | February 2014 | Fresher by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| H300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony H300
| WG-M1 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys outer dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony H300 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony H300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-M1 vs the H300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and H300 is 91 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The visual here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and H300.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Sony H300 to deliver extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer WG-M1 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony H300 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dots |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 590 gr (1.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 350 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $2,000 | $249 |