Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX5
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31


92 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX5 Overview
Following is a complete review of the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony HX5, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and HX5 (10MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and HX5 (1/2.4") posses different sensor sizes.

The WG-M1 was unveiled 4 years after the HX5 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the WG-M1 scores versus the HX5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony HX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony HX5
WG-M1 | HX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | ![]() | June 2010 | More modern by 52 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX5 over the Ricoh WG-M1
HX5 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony HX5
WG-M1 | HX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX5 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys outer measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony HX5 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony HX5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the HX5.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and HX5 is 91 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The picture below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and HX5.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-M1 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-M1 will give you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony HX5 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | (1×) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 200 grams (0.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, optional SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $2,000 | $275 |