Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX10
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
58 Imaging
51 Features
76 Overall
61
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Released March 2014
- Later Model is Sony RX10 II
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX10 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony RX10, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and RX10 (20MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and RX10 (1") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was unveiled 6 months later than the RX10 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WG-M1 scores vs the RX10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony RX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony RX10
WG-M1 | RX10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
RX10 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1290k | 115k | Clearer screen (+1175k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony RX10
WG-M1 | RX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2014 | March 2014 | Same generation | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX10 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony RX10 has proportions of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") and a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony RX10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 against the RX10.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and RX10 is 91 and 58 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and RX10.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sony RX10 will provide extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX10 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2014-03-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | (1×) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 1.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 115k dots | 1,290k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | WhiteMagic |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.20 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 813 gr (1.79 pounds) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 474 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 420 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $2,000 | $698 |