Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released June 2013
- Successor is Sony RX1R II
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony RX1R, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and RX1R (Full frame) provide different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-M1 was released 15 months later than the RX1R which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-M1 scores vs the RX1R for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony RX1R
| WG-M1 | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | June 2013 | Fresher by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Ricoh WG-M1
| RX1R | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+1114k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony RX1R
| WG-M1 | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony RX1R in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 and the RX1R.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and RX1R is 91 and 79 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and RX1R.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WG-M1 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Sony RX1R will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2013-06-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115k dot | 1,229k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 482g (1.06 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 91 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2537 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 270 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $2,000 | $2,798 |
