Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released June 2013
- Successor is Sony RX1R II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony RX1R, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and RX1R (Full frame) provide different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was released 15 months later than the RX1R which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-M1 scores vs the RX1R for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony RX1R
| WG-M1 | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | June 2013 | Fresher by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Ricoh WG-M1
| RX1R | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+1114k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony RX1R
| WG-M1 | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony RX1R in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 and the RX1R.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and RX1R is 91 and 79 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and RX1R.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WG-M1 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Sony RX1R will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2013-06-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115k dot | 1,229k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 482g (1.06 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 91 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2537 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 270 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $2,000 | $2,798 |