Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2000
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2000 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2000, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and S2000 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-M1 was launched 4 years later than the S2000 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WG-M1 scores against the S2000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony S2000
| WG-M1 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| S2000 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony S2000
| WG-M1 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers outside dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has proportions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the S2000.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and S2000 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specifications. The photograph below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and S2000.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $2,000 | $225 |
