Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
93 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony S2100, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the S2100 (12MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was introduced 4 years later than the S2100 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the S2100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony S2100
| WG-M1 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| S2100 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony S2100
| WG-M1 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys outside measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony S2100 has specifications of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony S2100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the S2100.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and S2100 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The visual below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and S2100.
All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to give you extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $2,000 | $0 |