Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
93 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony S2100, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the S2100 (12MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-M1 was introduced 4 years later than the S2100 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the WG-M1 matches up versus the S2100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony S2100
| WG-M1 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| S2100 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony S2100
| WG-M1 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys outside measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony S2100 has specifications of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Sony S2100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the S2100.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and S2100 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The visual below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and S2100.
All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to give you extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony S2100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $2,000 | $0 |