Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T90
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
96 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 15mm
- Announced February 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T90 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony T90, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the T90 (12MP) is pretty close and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was introduced 5 years after the T90 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony T90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the WG-M1 scores versus the T90 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T90 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony T90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony T90
| WG-M1 | T90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T90 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| T90 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony T90
| WG-M1 | T90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T90 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 provides outer measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony T90 has dimensions of 94mm x 57mm x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") along with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony T90 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-M1 vs the T90.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and T90 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T90 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and T90.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T90 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony T90 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-09-12 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 1 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 148 gr (0.33 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 94 x 57 x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $2,000 | $259 |
