Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX100V
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
- Launched January 2011
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX100V Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX100V, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the TX100V (16MP) is fairly close and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-M1 was brought out 3 years later than the TX100V and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the WG-M1 scores vs the TX100V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX100V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony TX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony TX100V
WG-M1 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | January 2011 | Fresher by 45 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Ricoh WG-M1
TX100V | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | 1.5" | Larger display (+2") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 115k | Clearer display (+1114k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony TX100V
WG-M1 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony TX100V has sizing of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX100V in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-M1 and the TX100V.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and TX100V is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The graphic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and TX100V.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Sony TX100V to render greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher WG-M1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX100V Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
Display resolution | 115k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 147 grams (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $2,000 | $380 |