Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX200V
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony TX200V, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was launched 2 years after the TX200V which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the WG-M1 grades vs the TX200V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony TX200V
| WG-M1 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TX200V | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+1115k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony TX200V
| WG-M1 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys external dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony TX200V in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the WG-M1 vs the TX200V.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and TX200V is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through specifications. The picture below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and TX200V.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Sony TX200V to give you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Display resolution | 115k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) | 129 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 220 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $2,000 | $500 |