Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX66
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
97 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX66 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Released February 2012
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX66 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX66, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and TX66 (18MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-M1 was brought out 2 years after the TX66 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX66 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WG-M1 grades versus the TX66 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX66 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Sony TX66 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony TX66
| WG-M1 | TX66 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX66 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TX66 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3.3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+1115k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony TX66
| WG-M1 | TX66 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX66 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with external dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony TX66 has specifications of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") with a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX66 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the WG-M1 vs the TX66.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and TX66 is 91 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX66 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The pic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and TX66.
All in all, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Sony TX66 to deliver greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher WG-M1 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX66 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony TX66 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5" | 3.3" |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 109g (0.24 lb) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 250 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $2,000 | $350 |