Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9eace/9eacea26a4bf5955ea04cac4c2b7e2153e171339" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4 front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Other Name is EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 197g - 103 x 64 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FT4
- Previous Model is Panasonic TS3
- Replacement is Panasonic TS5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic TS4, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TS4 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TS4 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-330 was introduced 6 years earlier than the TS4 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic TS4 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-330 matches up vs the TS4 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Panasonic TS4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic TS4
E-330 | TS4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS4 over the Olympus E-330
TS4 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | March 2006 | Newer by 71 months |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic TS4
E-330 | TS4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outside dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Panasonic TS4 has sizing of 103mm x 64mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 197 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic TS4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-330 and the TS4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cc7e/7cc7e4485359374e00f9011776869c79a21a6562" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and TS4 is 65 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/848e2/848e28c7e5efddcb565e49ed71b60be57c77fd4a" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The picture underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and TS4.
All in all, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic TS4 will show more detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/889bd/889bd5f08e90d09472939282f694d329664879d6" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/765ca/765caa1f966c80259ff0a356740f4fef1ae3af51" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DMC-FT4 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2012-01-31 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1300s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 lb) | 197g (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 103 x 64 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 310 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $1,100 | $399 |