Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
33
Overall
34

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Launched March 2006
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-450
Panasonic TS4
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 197g - 103 x 64 x 27mm
  • Released January 2012
  • Other Name is Lumix DMC-FT4
  • Previous Model is Panasonic TS3
  • Replacement is Panasonic TS5
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Overview

The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic TS4, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TS4 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TS4 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.

Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

The E-330 was introduced 6 years earlier than the TS4 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic TS4 being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-330 matches up vs the TS4 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic TS4

 E-330 TS4 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Panasonic TS4 over the Olympus E-330

 TS4 E-330 
ReleasedJanuary 2012March 2006Newer by 71 months
Screen dimension2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kCrisper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic TS4

 E-330 TS4 
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outside dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Panasonic TS4 has sizing of 103mm x 64mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 197 grams (0.43 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic TS4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-330 and the TS4.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and TS4 is 65 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The picture underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and TS4.

All in all, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic TS4 will show more detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic TS4 Portrait photography highlights
54
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
resolution not great (7 megapixels)
21
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography factors
Panasonic TS4 Street photography factors
60
tilting screen
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than others in class (616 grams)
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
61
image stabilization (Optical)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic TS4 as a Sports photography camera
40
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
resolution not great (7MP)
38
image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
better than average battery (310 per charge)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,300 seconds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic TS4 Travel photography highlights
50
lighter than others in class (616g)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
resolution not great (7 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
66
better than average battery (310 per charge)
environment sealing
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic TS4 Landscape photography highlights
45
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5")
no image stabilization
resolution not great (7 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
41
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
environment sealing
better than average battery (310 shots)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Panasonic TS4
9
no video shooting
32
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have mic port
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic TS4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic TS4
 Olympus E-330Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4
Alternate name EVOLT E-330 Lumix DMC-FT4
Category Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Launched 2006-03-18 2012-01-31
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-128mm (4.6x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1300s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 5.60 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 lb) 197g (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 103 x 64 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 310 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $1,100 $399