Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W230
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
95 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W230 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony W230, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the W230 (12MP) is very close and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was manufactured 5 years after the W230 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the WG-M1 scores against the W230 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W230 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony W230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony W230
| WG-M1 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| W230 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony W230
| WG-M1 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers physical dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony W230 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony W230 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the WG-M1 vs the W230.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and W230 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The pic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and W230.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to result in extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W230 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 1 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.90 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 156g (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $2,000 | $180 |
