Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W320
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W320 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony W320, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-M1 was announced 4 years after the W320 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WG-M1 grades against the W320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony W320
| WG-M1 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 57 months |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| W320 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony W320
| WG-M1 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers external dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony W320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-M1 vs the W320.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and W320 is 91 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading technical specs. The picture here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and W320.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures but you really should take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more recent WG-M1 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 1 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 117g (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $2,000 | $269 |