Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX300
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Launched February 2013
- Successor is Sony WX350
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX300 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony WX300, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and WX300 (18MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-M1 was launched 19 months after the WX300 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WG-M1 matches up vs the WX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony WX300
| WG-M1 | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | February 2013 | Newer by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| WX300 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony WX300
| WG-M1 | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 features exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony WX300 has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony WX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-M1 versus the WX300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and WX300 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The picture here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and WX300.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Sony WX300 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher WG-M1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony WX300 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2013-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.30 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 166g (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BX1 |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $2,000 | $330 |