Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A68
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
64 Imaging
66 Features
70 Overall
67
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Revealed November 2015
- Superseded the Sony A65
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A68 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A68, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and A68 (24MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and A68 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-M1 was introduced 14 months prior to the A68 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WG-M1 grades vs the A68 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A68 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sony SLT-A68. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sony A68
WG-M1 | A68 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Ricoh WG-M1
A68 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2015 | September 2014 | More modern by 14 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 2.7" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 115k | Clearer display (+346k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A68
WG-M1 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony A68 has proportions of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sony A68 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-M1 and the A68.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and A68 is 91 and 64 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through specs. The pic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-M1 and A68.
All in all, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-M1 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A68 will render more detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged WG-M1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sony A68 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony SLT-A68 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sony SLT-A68 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2015-11-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 79 |
Cross focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 1.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 610g (1.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 701 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 510 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | - | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $2,000 | $581 |