Samsung CL5 vs Samsung NX30
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
75 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Samsung CL5 vs Samsung NX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL10
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 375g - 127 x 96 x 58mm
- Launched January 2014
- Succeeded the Samsung NX20
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung CL5 vs Samsung NX30 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Samsung CL5 vs Samsung NX30, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are created by Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the CL5 (9MP) and NX30 (20MP) and the CL5 (1/2.5") and NX30 (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CL5 was introduced 5 years before the NX30 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX30 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the CL5 grades versus the NX30 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung CL5 vs Samsung NX30 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung CL5 & Samsung NX30. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung CL5 Gallery & Samsung NX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Samsung NX30
| CL5 | NX30 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX30 over the Samsung CL5
| NX30 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 59 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1036k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+806k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung CL5 and Samsung NX30
| CL5 | NX30 |
|---|
Samsung CL5 vs Samsung NX30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Samsung CL5 features external measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Samsung NX30 has specifications of 127mm x 96mm x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") along with a weight of 375 grams (0.83 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung CL5 vs Samsung NX30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the CL5 against the NX30.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the CL5 and NX30 is 95 and 75 respectively.
Samsung CL5 vs Samsung NX30 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The picture below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the CL5 and NX30.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The CL5 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Samsung NX30 will give you greater detail using its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged CL5 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung CL5 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung CL5 vs Samsung NX30 Specifications
| Samsung CL5 | Samsung NX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung CL5 | Samsung NX30 |
| Also called | PL10 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2009-02-23 | 2014-01-03 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | DRIMeIV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 247 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-4.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,036 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.66x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 9.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 141 grams (0.31 pounds) | 375 grams (0.83 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 127 x 96 x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 77 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1014 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BP1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $391 | $699 |