Samsung CL5 vs Samsung WB800F
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung CL5 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL10
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung CL5 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Samsung CL5 and Samsung WB800F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the CL5 (9MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the CL5 (1/2.5") and WB800F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CL5 was manufactured 4 years prior to the WB800F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the CL5 matches up against the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung CL5 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung CL5 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are available at Samsung CL5 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Samsung WB800F
| CL5 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung CL5
| WB800F | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 47 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung CL5 and Samsung WB800F
| CL5 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Samsung CL5 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung CL5 offers outer measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Samsung CL5 and Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the CL5 vs the WB800F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the CL5 and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Samsung CL5 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the CL5 and WB800F.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The CL5 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung WB800F will produce extra detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older CL5 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung CL5 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung CL5 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung CL5 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung CL5 | Samsung WB800F |
| Also Known as | PL10 | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-02-23 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 141g (0.31 lb) | 218g (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $391 | $300 |