Samsung CL5 vs Sigma SD9
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Samsung CL5 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Other Name is PL10
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Later Model is Sigma SD10
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung CL5 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Samsung CL5 versus Sigma SD9, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the CL5 (9MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the CL5 (1/2.5") and SD9 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe CL5 was brought out 6 years after the SD9 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the CL5 matches up vs the SD9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung CL5 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung CL5 and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung CL5 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Sigma SD9
| CL5 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2009 |  | November 2002 | More modern by 77 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Clearer screen (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung CL5
| SD9 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Samsung CL5 and Sigma SD9
| CL5 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Samsung CL5 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung CL5 has got physical measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check out the Samsung CL5 versus Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the CL5 compared to the SD9.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CL5 and SD9 is 95 and 54 respectively.
Samsung CL5 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the CL5 and SD9.
Clearly, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The CL5 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung CL5 will deliver greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The newer CL5 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung CL5 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung CL5 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Samsung CL5 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model | Samsung CL5 | Sigma SD9 |
| Alternate name | PL10 | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2009-02-23 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 141 gr (0.31 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $391 | $3,001 |