Samsung CL80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Samsung CL80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also Known as ST5500
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung CL80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Samsung CL80 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Samsung. The image resolution of the CL80 (14MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CL80 was launched 3 years earlier than the Galaxy Camera 3G which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the CL80 scores vs the Galaxy Camera 3G when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung CL80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung CL80 & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The complete galleries are available at Samsung CL80 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| CL80 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Samsung CL80
| Galaxy Camera 3G | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 32 months |
| Display sizing | 4.8" |  | 3.7" | Larger display (+1.1") |
Common features in the Samsung CL80 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| CL80 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Samsung CL80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung CL80 comes with exterior dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has proportions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the Samsung CL80 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the CL80 versus the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CL80 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 95 and 90 respectively.
Samsung CL80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The image here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CL80 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to produce more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged CL80 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung CL80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung CL80 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
| Samsung CL80 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung CL80 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
| Otherwise known as | ST5500 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4334 x 3256 | - |
| Max native ISO | 4800 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.7" | 4.8" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 305 grams (0.67 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $400 | $606 |