Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f21bb/f21bbba72691e81aa737426aec1e12ce3349a5bb" alt="Samsung DV300F front Samsung DV300F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea7e4/ea7e4ee78f1fa0fb4022ac36c31077cfef4a19c1" alt="Samsung SL102 front Samsung SL102 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Samsung DV300F versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both of them are produced by Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the DV300F (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The DV300F was released 3 years after the SL102 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the DV300F grades vs the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung DV300F & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are available at Samsung DV300F Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Samsung SL102
DV300F | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung DV300F
SL102 | DV300F |
---|
Common features in the Samsung DV300F and Samsung SL102
DV300F | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Samsung DV300F has got outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung DV300F versus Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the DV300F against the SL102.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6f58/e6f58a643025c58af5db723150a964773056c5c1" alt="Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 size comparison Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the DV300F and SL102 is 96 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9ba4/e9ba411b6ca5ffe2478ef9fece1ee1a0189b67d6" alt="Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The picture below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the DV300F and SL102.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung DV300F to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The younger DV300F is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51626/516265e55a512185de12ce7fbfd07a7341516609" alt="Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison"
Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47540/47540cad489e67b36f2d2e53bce02369eb9847da" alt="Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Samsung DV300F vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Samsung DV300F | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung DV300F | Samsung SL102 |
Also Known as | - | ES55 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-01-02 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-125mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.5-6.3 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.10 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 133 gr (0.29 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP88 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $200 | $130 |