Samsung DV300F vs Sony A350
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
62 Imaging
53 Features
47 Overall
50
Samsung DV300F vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Replacement is Sony A380
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung DV300F vs Sony A350 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Samsung DV300F versus Sony A350, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the DV300F (16MP) and the A350 (14MP) is relatively close but the DV300F (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe DV300F was revealed 3 years after the A350 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung DV300F being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the DV300F grades vs the A350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung DV300F vs Sony A350 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung DV300F & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The full galleries are provided at Samsung DV300F Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Sony A350
| DV300F | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | June 2008 | More modern by 44 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Samsung DV300F
| A350 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Samsung DV300F and Sony A350
| DV300F | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Samsung DV300F vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung DV300F features external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Look at the Samsung DV300F versus Sony A350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the DV300F versus the A350.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the DV300F and A350 is 96 and 62 respectively.
Samsung DV300F vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The picture here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the DV300F and A350.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The DV300F having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Samsung DV300F will render extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern DV300F is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung DV300F vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung DV300F vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Samsung DV300F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung DV300F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2012-01-02 | 2008-06-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 25-125mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.5-6.3 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133 grams (0.29 lb) | 674 grams (1.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP88 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $200 | $600 |
