Samsung EX2F vs Samsung HZ35W
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Samsung EX2F vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung EX2F vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Samsung EX2F vs Samsung HZ35W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX2F (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX2F (1/1.7") and HZ35W (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe EX2F was brought out 2 years later than the HZ35W and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX2F scores vs the HZ35W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung EX2F vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung EX2F & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung EX2F Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Samsung HZ35W
| EX2F | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Samsung EX2F
| HZ35W | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+614k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung EX2F and Samsung HZ35W
| EX2F | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Samsung EX2F vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung EX2F features outside dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Samsung EX2F vs Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX2F and the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX2F and HZ35W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Samsung EX2F vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX2F and HZ35W.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with the identical MP but different sensor measurements. The EX2F features the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The more recent EX2F provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung EX2F vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Samsung EX2F vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Samsung EX2F | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung EX2F | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called | - | WB650 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-80mm (3.3x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.4-2.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 0k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | AMOLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 294 grams (0.65 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 48 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 209 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $478 | $300 |