Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Renewed by Samsung GX-20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Photography Glossary Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GX-10 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GX-10 (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GX-10 was launched 7 years before the WB800F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the GX-10 matches up versus the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung GX-10 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung GX-10 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Samsung WB800F
| GX-10 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung GX-10
| WB800F | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | September 2006 | More modern by 76 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 210k | Crisper screen (+250k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung GX-10 and Samsung WB800F
| GX-10 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung GX-10 offers exterior measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the GX-10 against the WB800F.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GX-10 and WB800F is 59 and 92 respectively.
Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The image here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GX-10 and WB800F.
Plainly, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GX-10 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB800F will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GX-10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung GX-10 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung GX-10 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2006-09-21 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 210k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 793 grams (1.75 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $850 | $300 |