Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Renewed by Samsung GX-20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GX-10 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the GX-10 (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe GX-10 was launched 7 years before the WB800F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the GX-10 matches up versus the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung GX-10 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung GX-10 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Samsung WB800F
| GX-10 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung GX-10
| WB800F | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | September 2006 | More modern by 76 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 210k | Crisper screen (+250k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung GX-10 and Samsung WB800F
| GX-10 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung GX-10 offers exterior measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the GX-10 against the WB800F.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GX-10 and WB800F is 59 and 92 respectively.
Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The image here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GX-10 and WB800F.
Plainly, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GX-10 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB800F will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GX-10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung GX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung GX-10 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung GX-10 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2006-09-21 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 210k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 793 grams (1.75 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $850 | $300 |