Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T900
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T900 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T900, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the GX-10 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the GX-10 (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GX-10 was introduced 3 years before the T900 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the GX-10 scores vs the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung GX-10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are available at Samsung GX-10 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Sony T900
GX-10 | T900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung GX-10
T900 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2009 | September 2006 | Fresher by 29 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 210k | Clearer display (+712k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung GX-10 and Sony T900
GX-10 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung GX-10 has physical measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs) and the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the GX-10 against the T900.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the GX-10 and T900 is 59 and 96 respectively.
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GX-10 and T900.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GX-10 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony T900 will give greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The older GX-10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Samsung GX-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung GX-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2006-09-21 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 210k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 793g (1.75 lbs) | 143g (0.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $850 | $300 |