Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T99
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Announced September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Released July 2010
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T99 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T99, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the GX-10 (10MP) and T99 (14MP) and the GX-10 (APS-C) and T99 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GX-10 was manufactured 4 years prior to the T99 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the GX-10 grades vs the T99 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T99 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung GX-10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung GX-10 Gallery & Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Sony T99
GX-10 | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Samsung GX-10
T99 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | September 2006 | More recent by 46 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 210k | Sharper display (+20k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung GX-10 and Sony T99
GX-10 | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung GX-10 provides physical dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs) while the Sony T99 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T99 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the GX-10 versus the T99.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GX-10 and T99 is 59 and 96 respectively.
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GX-10 and T99.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GX-10 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony T99 will offer extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older GX-10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony T99 Specifications
Samsung GX-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung GX-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2006-09-21 | 2010-07-08 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 210k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 793g (1.75 lb) | 121g (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $850 | $179 |