Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc7ea/dc7eae8dfcdf015ab3f3221abf91ebb5af0f0aea" alt="Samsung GX-10 front Samsung GX-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cb00/7cb00ed60de78a6725fc673171ba91315aad3000" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Announced September 2006
- Successor is Samsung GX-20
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Announced July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Samsung GX-10 and Sony TX9, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the GX-10 (10MP) and the TX9 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the GX-10 (APS-C) and TX9 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The GX-10 was brought out 4 years earlier than the TX9 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the GX-10 scores versus the TX9 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung GX-10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung GX-10 Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Sony TX9
GX-10 | TX9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Samsung GX-10
TX9 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 46 months |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper screen (+712k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung GX-10 and Sony TX9
GX-10 | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung GX-10 comes with external dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs) whilst the Sony TX9 has dimensions of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Samsung GX-10 and Sony TX9 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the GX-10 versus the TX9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5ee0/c5ee0a1674efc6bc0a6b5f55c085ae781a675856" alt="Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 size comparison Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GX-10 and TX9 is 59 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb07c/eb07cf147db20cb7c29fd33950e5aff9d6e8efaa" alt="Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 top view buttons comparison Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The visual underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GX-10 and TX9.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GX-10 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Sony TX9 will give greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older GX-10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1e83/c1e83190ef2d89a820e6581c50092df77464feb0" alt="Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 sensor size comparison Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 sensor size comparison"
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6501b/6501b133928178edc691fb595635abe5df16bdb7" alt="Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Samsung GX-10 vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Samsung GX-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung GX-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2006-09-21 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 151 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 210k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 793g (1.75 lbs) | 149g (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $850 | $799 |