Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a851/5a851ef78e48f8e044878a725f768ce7cb93cf0c" alt="Samsung GX-1L front Samsung GX-1L front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47f7d/47f7d7b1e27877de843384ed6303648cfc08aee4" alt="Samsung HZ35W front Samsung HZ35W front"
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced February 2006
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the GX-1L (6MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the GX-1L (APS-C) and HZ35W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The GX-1L was announced 5 years earlier than the HZ35W which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the GX-1L matches up versus the HZ35W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung GX-1L & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung GX-1L Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Samsung HZ35W
GX-1L | HZ35W |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Samsung GX-1L
HZ35W | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2010 | ![]() | February 2006 | More modern by 52 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 210k | Clearer screen (+404k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung GX-1L and Samsung HZ35W
GX-1L | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung GX-1L offers outside measurements of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the GX-1L vs the HZ35W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc40d/dc40da1ca20f5283450f59642b4f21bb9180c5b8" alt="Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GX-1L and HZ35W is 69 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54834/548347a40f2d16620beaea4feff980fdb3543bc7" alt="Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison"
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through specifications. The image here may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GX-1L and HZ35W.
To sum up, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The GX-1L having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung HZ35W will give you more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged GX-1L is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f202/5f202245f5cf2f64a1bbc9a67cab3240bcaba5f9" alt="Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison"
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b427d/b427d1c9ffd9f41fa39da861e4307840a530073c" alt="Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Samsung GX-1L | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung GX-1L | Samsung HZ35W |
Alternate name | - | WB650 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2006-02-24 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3008 x 2008 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 5 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Pentax KAF | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 210 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 96% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.57x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.50 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 570 gr (1.26 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/MMC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $300 |