Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a851/5a851ef78e48f8e044878a725f768ce7cb93cf0c" alt="Samsung GX-1L front Samsung GX-1L front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9341/e93412f40c7362d3e09ff5f3d2f972e609f5d64d" alt="Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Revealed February 2006
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Samsung GX-1L and Samsung SL202, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GX-1L (6MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the GX-1L (APS-C) and SL202 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The GX-1L was brought out 4 years prior to the SL202 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the GX-1L grades vs the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung GX-1L and Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are available at Samsung GX-1L Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Samsung SL202
GX-1L | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung GX-1L
SL202 | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2009 | ![]() | February 2006 | More modern by 36 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper screen (+20k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung GX-1L and Samsung SL202
GX-1L | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung GX-1L comes with outer dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Samsung GX-1L and Samsung SL202 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the GX-1L vs the SL202.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99281/992817aef35a353481123f2b7fb9630f4e032118" alt="Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 size comparison Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GX-1L and SL202 is 69 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/538a5/538a57a7593ea2e884e34ff65b116876098f7694" alt="Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GX-1L and SL202.
Clearly, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GX-1L because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung SL202 will offer more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged GX-1L is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fbf1/6fbf18a925f14b412a32f6a05cb6465a1061ae80" alt="Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison"
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07a0c/07a0c4ba7e2465a1739b70bc04be822145c5a786" alt="Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Samsung GX-1L vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Samsung GX-1L | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung GX-1L | Samsung SL202 |
Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2006-02-24 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3008 x 2008 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 5 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Pentax KAF | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 210 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 96% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.57x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.50 m | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 570 grams (1.26 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/MMC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $0 | $140 |