Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f84/67f84ba37112e0b724a4e30ca9f4099db427b4f9" alt="Samsung GX-1S front Samsung GX-1S front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62d54/62d540e477b2fc4e185bed99aff836ee8cf05e0d" alt="Samsung HZ25W front Samsung HZ25W front"
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released January 2006
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Released July 2010
- Other Name is WB5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Let's look closer at the Samsung GX-1S and Samsung HZ25W, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Samsung. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the GX-1S (6MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the GX-1S (APS-C) and HZ25W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The GX-1S was introduced 5 years earlier than the HZ25W and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the GX-1S scores vs the HZ25W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung GX-1S & Samsung HZ25W. The whole galleries are available at Samsung GX-1S Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Samsung HZ25W
GX-1S | HZ25W |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Samsung GX-1S
HZ25W | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | ![]() | January 2006 | More recent by 54 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper display (+20k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung GX-1S and Samsung HZ25W
GX-1S | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung GX-1S enjoys physical measurements of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung GX-1S and Samsung HZ25W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the GX-1S compared to the HZ25W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb0fc/fb0fc2da7bf70ef48fb3751ae2ab3d6e2170f60a" alt="Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GX-1S and HZ25W is 68 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5a79/d5a793ca675de24f7f8cda05ed22b8c43e96bdef" alt="Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison"
Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GX-1S and HZ25W.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GX-1S using its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Samsung HZ25W will produce greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The older GX-1S will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6bb5/e6bb58459a0f22f50ed00023255dd7aa3d3b9d2a" alt="Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison"
Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bf6d/0bf6dc21b2158e1692563ed48082fb0b7464541f" alt="Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
Samsung GX-1S | Samsung HZ25W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung GX-1S | Samsung HZ25W |
Also Known as | - | WB5000 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2006-01-16 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3008 x 2008 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Pentax KAF | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 210 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 605 gr (1.33 pounds) | 428 gr (0.94 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/MMC card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $850 | $350 |