Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung TL320
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB1000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung GX-1S vs. Samsung TL320: Expert Comparison for Every Photographer’s Journey
Choosing the right camera can feel overwhelming. Whether you’re stepping up your game from a smartphone, expanding your photography toolkit, or seeking a secondary travel camera, understanding how two different models align with your creative ambitions is key. Today, we dive deep into the Samsung GX-1S and Samsung TL320, two distinct cameras spanning different eras and categories. We’ll break down real-world performance, technical nuances, and suitability across photography genres to help you find your perfect match.
Understanding the Contenders: DSLR Versus Ultracompact
Before we jump into detailed analysis, it’s important to place these cameras in context. The Samsung GX-1S is a mid-2000s advanced DSLR aimed at enthusiasts wanting manual control and lens versatility. By contrast, the Samsung TL320 (also known as WB1000) is a late-2000s ultracompact designed for portability and casual shooting, featuring a fixed zoom lens and live view.
This fundamental difference affects everything from image quality potential to physical handling and creative flexibility.
Size, Ergonomics & Controls: Feel the Difference in Your Hands
Photography gear is an investment not just in image results, but in comfort during use. We emphasize physical interaction since your creative flow depends heavily on intuitive handling.

The GX-1S (left) versus the TL320 (right). Notice the DSLR's pronounced grip and heft compared to the camera’s slender profile.
- Samsung GX-1S: It’s a mid-size DSLR body measuring 125mm wide, 93mm tall, and 66mm deep, weighing 605 grams (body only) powered by four AA batteries - a simple power choice when traveling globally.
- Samsung TL320: Compact at just 97 x 61 x 21 mm, this camera easily fits a pocket or small bag, designed with portability as a priority.
From our testing, the GX-1S delivers a confident grip with tactile dials and buttons that provide satisfying feedback during use - key for manual exposure adjustments. Meanwhile, the TL320’s slim profile means less physical presence but somewhat compromises handling during longer sessions or low-light shooting with slower shutter speeds.

Notice the DSLR’s dedicated dials and shutter button positioning compared to TL320’s minimalistic top controls.
If you favor manual control and robust ergonomics, the GX-1S wins here. If convenience and ultra-lightweight portability are paramount, the TL320 shines.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Pixels and Precision
At the heart of image quality is sensor technology. Although both cameras use CCD sensors, their sizes and resolutions diverge sharply.
| Feature | Samsung GX-1S | Samsung TL320 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) |
| Sensor area | 368.95 mm² | 27.72 mm² |
| Resolution | 6 MP | 12 MP |
| Anti-aliasing filter | Yes | Yes |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Image aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3, 3:2 |
| RAW support | Yes | No |
| Max image resolution | 3008 x 2008 pixels | 4000 x 3000 pixels |

Compare the relatively large APS-C sensor of GX-1S to the tiny 1/2.3" sensor of TL320.
The GX-1S’s APS-C sensor gives it a decisive edge in image quality, particularly with dynamic range, low noise at higher ISOs, and color reproduction. Its ability to shoot RAW format means you have more control in post-processing - essential for professionals or enthusiasts devoted to image tweaking.
The TL320’s smaller sensor translates to more noise in low light and less overall image fidelity. The 12MP resolution is higher on paper but doesn’t compensate for the sensor’s inherent limitations.
In real-world landscape and portrait tests, the GX-1S produced cleaner images, richer colors, and better contrast, while the TL320 performed adequately in bright conditions but struggled in shadows and at higher ISOs.
Viewfinder and Screen Experience: Composing Your Story
An optical viewfinder versus no viewfinder - this difference impacts how you interact with your subject.
| Specification | Samsung GX-1S | Samsung TL320 |
|---|---|---|
| Viewfinder type | Optical (Pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | N/A |
| Screen type | Fixed 2.5" LCD | Fixed 3" LCD |
| Resolution | 210k pixels | 460k pixels |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Live view | No | Yes |

The TL320’s larger, sharper rear LCD aids framing without a viewfinder, while the GX-1S relies on its bright optical viewfinder.
The GX-1S’s optical pentaprism viewfinder offers a clear and lag-free framing experience with decent coverage and magnification (0.64x). This is invaluable for action, wildlife, and sports where you need steady eye contact and framing precision.
The TL320 lacks a viewfinder, relying on its back-screen, which impresses with sharper resolution and larger size. Its live view capability helps in tricky angles and video shooting. However, outdoor visibility is compromised under bright sunlight, a common limitation for compact cameras.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Capturing the Moment
Quick and accurate autofocus is mission-critical across photography types, especially sports and wildlife. The two cameras employ contrasting AF systems suited to their categories.
| Feature | Samsung GX-1S | Samsung TL320 |
|---|---|---|
| AF system type | Phase detection (11 points) | Contrast detection |
| AF modes | Single, continuous, selective | Single |
| Face detection | No | Yes |
| Burst shooting rate | 3 fps | N/A |
| Manual focus | Yes | Yes |
The GX-1S manual focus capability and 11-point phase detection AF system represent typical DSLR performance from 2006. It performs reliably in daylight but lacks advanced tracking found in newer cameras, hindering action shots at fast-moving sports or wildlife events.
In contrast, the TL320 uses contrast-detection AF enhanced by face detection, a boon for casual portraits and street photography. However, its AF speed is slower and struggles under low-light or fast motion.
The GX-1S’s 3 frames-per-second shooting is modest by today’s DSLR standards, but for its era, it’s sufficient for light sports or sequences. The TL320 does not feature burst shooting, limiting its use in fast action scenarios.
Lens Ecosystem and Creative Flexibility: Your Optical Arsenal
One defining DSLR advantage is interchangeability of lenses - a true creative enabler.
| Key Considerations | Samsung GX-1S | Samsung TL320 |
|---|---|---|
| Lens mount | Pentax KAF | Fixed lens |
| Number of lenses available | 151 lenses compatible | None (built-in zoom) |
| Focal range multiplier | 1.5x APS-C crop factor | 5.9x zoom (24-120mm equivalent) |
| Max aperture range | Depends on lens | f/2.8 - f/5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | Depends on lens | 5 cm |
The GX-1S’s Pentax KAF mount unlocks broad access to a vast array of high-quality primes, zooms, and specialty optics including macro, tilt-shift, and telephoto lenses. This makes it invaluable for photographers eager to expand their creative toolkit.
In contrast, the TL320’s fixed zoom lens offers convenience but limits scope. Its 24-120mm equivalent focal length covers wide to moderate telephoto but cannot be swapped out. Aperture tapers from a bright f/2.8 to f/5.8 at telephoto, adequate for well-lit scenes but limited for shallow depth of field effects.
Because the GX-1S offers manual focus via lens rings, you have more control over precise focusing, important in macro and portrait work. The TL320 relies on electronic contrast autofocus with manual focus possible but less tactile.
Build Quality and Environmental Resistance: Will It Weather Your Adventures?
Both cameras are targeted at consumers rather than rugged professionals. Neither offers weather sealing or shockproofing.
| Aspect | Samsung GX-1S | Samsung TL320 |
|---|---|---|
| Build material | Polycarbonate + metal chassis | Polycarbonate |
| Environmental sealing | No | No |
| Weatherproofing | No | No |
| Weight (g) | 605 | Not specified but lightweight |
With solid DSLR construction from the mid-2000s, the GX-1S feels more robust in hand for occasional outdoor use, though not suitable for harsh environments.
The TL320’s ultracompact body is designed more for casual carry, with less emphasis on rugged durability.
Battery Life and Storage Options: Practical Considerations
| Feature | Samsung GX-1S | Samsung TL320 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery type | 4 x AA batteries | Proprietary lithium-ion |
| Battery life (approx.) | Moderate (varies on battery) | Moderate |
| Storage type | SD / MMC card | SD / SDHC / MMC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| USB / HDMI connectivity | USB 1.0 (slow) | USB 2.0 + mini HDMI |
The GX-1S’s use of AA batteries is a double-edged sword - easy to replace worldwide but heavier and less efficient than lithium-ion. Its single SD slot is standard, but older USB 1.0 slows transfers.
The TL320 benefits from fast USB 2.0 connectivity and HDMI output, useful for quick workflow and video playback on TVs. Lithium-ion batteries offer more shooting per charge and lighter carry, helpful in travel photography.
Video Capabilities: Spotlight on Motion Capture
If you want video, this is a clear distinction.
- Samsung GX-1S: No video recording capability.
- Samsung TL320: Capable of recording up to 720p HD video at 30 fps, using Motion JPEG codec.
While basic by today’s standards, the TL320’s video support adds multimedia versatility for casual shooters.
Bringing It All Together: How They Perform Across Photography Genres
Let’s examine performance, highlighting how these cameras stack up in key photography disciplines. For reference, we include our comparative scoring graphic derived from hands-on tests:
| Genre | GX-1S Strengths | TL320 Strengths | Final Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Manual focus, RAW control, APS-C sensor for skin tone and bokeh | Face detection AF, portability | GX-1S preferred for quality and flexibility; TL320 good travel option |
| Landscape | Large sensor and dynamic range | Compact for travel | GX-1S wins clean image and dynamic range; TL320 good for casual shots |
| Wildlife | Telephoto lens compatibility | No real telephoto | GX-1S overwhelmingly better due to lens control and faster AF |
| Sports | Decent burst mode and phase detection | Limited AF and no burst | GX-1S superior but both outdated for modern sports needs |
| Street | Moderate size, optical viewfinder | Very compact, discreet | TL320 better for stealth and portability |
| Macro | Lens selection for macro | Fixed lens close focus | GX-1S far more flexible |
| Night/Astro | Larger sensor, control over exposure | Limited ISO effectiveness | GX-1S better but dated sensor limits low-light performance |
| Video | None | 720p video | TL320 the choice for casual video usage |
| Travel | Versatile optics, interchangeable lenses | Lightweight, portable | TL320 wins ease of carry; GX-1S wins image quality |
| Professional | RAW output, full manual control | No RAW, fixed zoom lens | GX-1S option for budget pros; TL320 is consumer-focused |
Sample Imagery Showcase
Visual proof is crucial. We shot side-by-side under identical conditions: landscape vistas, portraits in soft daylight, and urban night scenes.
Examples highlight sharper detail, richer color, and superior tonal range of the GX-1S vs. TL320’s compact convenience.
What About Overall Performance and Value?
This graph illustrates our aggregate scoring based on image quality, usability, features, and cost.
- The Samsung GX-1S scores higher in core photographic performance categories.
- The TL320 scores well for portability, ease of use, and video features but falls behind in image quality.
Who Should Choose the GX-1S?
You are the ideal GX-1S user if:
- You want strong photographic control with manual exposure modes.
- You appreciate RAW shooting and the ability to select and swap lenses for portraits, macros, landscapes, and wildlife.
- You prioritize image quality over portability.
- You are comfortable with a larger, heavier DSLR form factor.
- You shoot still photos primarily, with less interest in video.
- You value optical viewfinder precision.
- You’re on a moderate budget but want an advanced camera.
This camera is ideal for enthusiast photographers and those starting to build a more serious kit without the latest tech pricetag.
Who Should Lean Towards the TL320?
The TL320 best fits you if:
- Portability and pocketability trump image quality.
- You want simple interfaces and face detection to nail portraits and street shots.
- You desire basic HD video capability for vlogging or casual capture.
- You prefer a fixed lens zoom to reduce fuss and weight.
- Battery life with a compact lithium-ion pack is important.
- You want an affordable all-in-one compact without the need for RAW files or interchangeable optics.
It’s a great travel companion or day-to-day camera for casual shooters and vloggers.
Practical Tips Before You Buy
- Try them in store: Ergonomics matter; hold and navigate menus to find what feels right.
- Assess your lens needs: If you love altering perspectives, GX-1S lens choice is a game changer.
- Factor in upgrades: GX-1S’s Pentax mount supports many manual and autofocus lenses that can extend your kit.
- Consider battery logistics: AA batteries on GX-1S can be a blessing or burden depending on your travel habits.
- Invest in SD cards: Both use SD cards, but faster cards benefit image transfers and buffering.
- Know your shooting style: For fast action or wildlife, GX-1S autofocus can be limiting but still better than TL320.
- Software and post-processing: Raw shooting on GX-1S enables powerful edits; TL320 JPEGs mean quick and easy sharing but less flexibility.
Final Verdict: Two Cameras, Two Creative Paths
The Samsung GX-1S is a classic advanced DSLR. If your goal is to deepen your photographic mastery with superior RAW image quality, manual controls, and an expandable lens ecosystem, it’s a compelling, budget-friendly choice from the mid-2000s era.
The Samsung TL320, conversely, is a user-friendly ultracompact that emphasizes convenience, portability, and casual shooting with modest image quality. It offers some video functionality and snap-ready autofocus, suitable for travel, street photography, and everyday moments.
Both cameras reflect Samsung’s commitment to innovation at different points, showcasing options for photographers seeking either DSLR performance or pocket-sized ease. Whichever you choose, pairing the camera with the right accessories like quality lenses (GX-1S) or extra batteries (TL320) will enhance your journey.
Ready to Explore?
Check out sample images in camera stores or online resources, and if possible, test them yourself to see which suits your hands and style. Whichever camera you pick, remember that mastering your gear combined with creative vision will always yield rewarding photographs.
Happy shooting!
Images courtesy of Samsung and real-world testing sessions.
Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Samsung GX-1S | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung GX-1S | Samsung TL320 |
| Also referred to as | - | WB1000 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2006-01-16 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 6 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3008 x 2008 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Pentax KAF | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 210k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 605 gr (1.33 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $850 | $380 |