Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f84/67f84ba37112e0b724a4e30ca9f4099db427b4f9" alt="Samsung GX-1S front Samsung GX-1S front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d88a7/d88a7812e71c59a9e4e86f9ed56f4270378edf4e" alt="Sigma SD9 front Sigma SD9 front"
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced November 2002
- New Model is Sigma SD10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9, both Advanced DSLR cameras by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the GX-1S (6MP) and SD9 (3MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The GX-1S was revealed 3 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the GX-1S grades versus the SD9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung GX-1S and Sigma SD9. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung GX-1S Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Sigma SD9
GX-1S | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2006 | ![]() | November 2002 | More recent by 39 months |
Screen dimensions | 2.5" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Screen resolution | 210k | ![]() | 130k | Clearer screen (+80k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung GX-1S
SD9 | GX-1S |
---|
Common features in the Samsung GX-1S and Sigma SD9
GX-1S | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung GX-1S features outer measurements of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
See the Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the GX-1S and the SD9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3052/a3052e88bc59d14f939fc74da1f4513586d6f0e3" alt="Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 size comparison Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GX-1S and SD9 is 68 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5254/b5254caac94f0a80c3aed2572fa2ece42101fead" alt="Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The graphic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GX-1S and SD9.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Samsung GX-1S to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern GX-1S will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47014/4701430cbb1b474b343effd704cfee8ee562e26a" alt="Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison"
Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e006b/e006bf8ac42110dccb1c91df56cad3ce2adc2d46" alt="Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung GX-1S vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Samsung GX-1S | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung GX-1S | Sigma SD9 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2006-01-16 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3008 x 2008 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Pentax KAF | Sigma SA |
Amount of lenses | 151 | 76 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 1.8" |
Display resolution | 210 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Highest video resolution | None | None |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 605 grams (1.33 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC card | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $850 | $3,001 |