Samsung GX-1S vs Sony W350
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40


97 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Samsung GX-1S vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released January 2006
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010

A Tale of Two Cameras: Samsung GX-1S DSLR vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 Ultracompact
Choosing your next camera is never a straightforward affair. With so many options on the market, each built for different needs and shooting styles, it helps to sink deep into the specs but also into real-world experience - the nuances that specs alone don’t tell you. Today, I’m comparing two pretty disparate cameras in form, purpose, and era: the 2006 Samsung GX-1S DSLR and the 2010 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 ultracompact point-and-shoot. Both may feel like relics by today's standards, yet they represent fascinating approaches to photography technology in their respective niches. If you’re curious how a mid-size DSLR stacks up against a compact traveler’s snapper, this is your deep, hands-on look - from sensor to ergonomics, autofocus to image quality, and more.
Design and Ergonomics: Size Matters - or Does It?
Right off the bat, the physical differences strike you. The Samsung GX-1S channels classic DSLR heft with its mid-size SLR body built around the Pentax KAF mount. It measures 125 x 93 x 66 mm and weighs about 605 grams without a lens - substantial enough to feel balanced in hand but not bulky by DSLR standards.
By contrast, the Sony W350 is the epitome of pocketability: just 91 x 52 x 17 mm, a nimble 117 grams. Tiny enough to forget it’s in your pocket, ideal for those moments when discretion and mobility matter most.
But size is more than weight; usability comes into play. The Samsung features a classic DSLR grip, a pentaprism optical viewfinder, and a top plate loaded with dials and buttons for quick control access (more on that shortly). The Sony’s slender slab design trades manual control for simplicity and convenience, featuring a fixed 2.7-inch screen and minimal physical buttons.
Ergonomically, if you love tactile feedback, a substantial grip, and direct control of exposure parameters, the GX-1S delivers in spades. For travelers or street photographers prioritizing stealth and speed, the W350’s diminutive footprint is a boon. But the trade-off is obvious: less manual control and a smaller sensor.
Control Layout and User Interface: Navigating Complexity vs. Simplicity
Looking closer at the Samsung’s design from above reveals its DSLR heritage with dedicated dials for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and shooting modes. There’s room to customize your shooting process with physical switches - a welcome feature for those who prefer hands-on adjustments without diving into menus.
The Sony, given its ultracompact class, opts for a minimalistic top layout with a combo power/shutter button and zoom lever. Most settings are changed through simple menus navigated on-screen. The trade-off here is between speed and simplicity: can you afford menu diving, or do you want instant control?
In use, the GX-1S’s physical controls translate into faster workflow for street or event photography, where swift changes mean the difference between capturing or missing a moment. The W350’s approach suits casual shooters or those who want an “always-ready” point-and-shoot, sacrificing manual finesse for convenience.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Pixels, Size, and Performance
Now, the heart of the camera: the sensor. The Samsung GX-1S is equipped with a CCD APS-C sensor measuring 23.5 x 15.7 mm, covering roughly 369 mm² with a resolution of 6 megapixels. Although 6 MP is modest by today’s standards, the physical size of the sensor and the inherent CCD characteristics generally deliver clean images with decent dynamic range and color depth, especially at base ISO 200.
The Sony W350 uses a much smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm), a tiny 28 mm² area, significantly constraining image quality potential. It compensates with a higher resolution (14 MP), but smaller pixels struggle more with noise and dynamic range. It also limits optical zoom equivalent due to focal length and sensor size constraints.
From hands-on shooting, the GX-1S’s larger sensor produces images with more depth and lower noise at mid and high ISOs (up to its max native ISO 3200, though with noticeable grain at higher sensitivities). Colors are pleasingly natural, and the CCD sensor yields smooth gradations, which is excellent for portraits and landscapes.
Meanwhile, the W350’s images are sharp in good light but struggle in low-light situations. I noticed visible noise creeping in even at ISO 400 and a narrower dynamic range limiting highlight and shadow detail preservation.
If perfect image quality is your priority, the GX-1S has the edge, given its sensor size and DSLR design philosophy. For casual snapshots and travel photos in ample light, the W350 works admirably.
The Art of Autofocus: Phase Detection Meets Contrast Detection
Autofocus often defines real-world usability. The Samsung GX-1S employs an 11-point phase detection system, typical of DSLRs of its era, favoring speed and relatively reliable tracking in good light. It offers single, continuous autofocus modes, along with selective multi-area focusing. However, there's no face, eye, or animal detection - advanced features that came later.
The Sony W350 uses contrast detection autofocus with 9 focus points, designed primarily for still subjects. It provides multi-area and center-weighted focus zones but lacks continuous tracking or sophisticated AI-based recognition.
In practice, the GX-1S’s autofocus feels more responsive, especially when paired with quality Pentax K-mount lenses, enabling wildlife or sports photography with cultivated precision. The Sony’s system works fine for general daytime use but can hunt noticeably in low light or when tracking moving subjects.
Burst and Shutter Speeds: Freezing Motion vs. Relaxed Capture
Samsung’s GX-1S offers a top shutter speed of 1/4000s and a continuous shooting mode capped at around 3 fps - healthy figures for 2006. It’s enough to catch casual sports action or fleeting wildlife moments but not cutting-edge by today’s standards.
Meanwhile, the Sony W350 maxes out at 1 fps continuous shooting, with a maximum shutter speed of 1/1600s. This indicates it’s designed more for leisurely shooting rather than high-speed bursts or fast shutter needs.
For action or sport photographers, the GX-1S’s shutter and burst capabilities are adequate, while the W350 is best suited for static scenes or slower pacing.
Viewing Experience: Optical Viewfinder vs. LCD Screen
The Samsung GX-1S comes with a pentaprism optical viewfinder covering 95% of the frame with 0.64x magnification. This provides a real-time, lag-free composition experience. The rear 2.5-inch fixed LCD sports a modest 210k-dot resolution, serving mainly for image playback since there’s no live view.
Sony’s W350 dispenses with the viewfinder entirely, relying on its bigger 2.7-inch 230k-dot fixed LCD screen for framing and playback. It also supports live view, which is standard for compact cameras.
Personally, I prefer an optical viewfinder for still photography as it provides a stable, glare-free experience especially in bright daylight. The Sony’s LCD-only setup works well in shade or indoors but can be challenging outdoors in bright sun.
Lens Flexibility: Pentax KAF Interchangeable vs. Fixed Zoom
A key DSLR advantage is the interchangeable lens system. The Samsung GX-1S uses the Pentax KAF mount, affording access to a broad range of compatible lenses - from ultra-wide to specialized primes, macros, and telephotos. I’ve tested many Pentax lenses; their solid optics lend versatility to the GX-1S in various genres. There are over 150 compatible lenses to choose from.
Conversely, the Sony W350 has a fixed 26-105mm equivalent zoom lens with an aperture range of f/2.7-5.7, meeting general travel and point-and-shoot needs. Its minimum focusing distance is 10 cm, decent for casual macro-like shots but no true macro specialization.
This means the GX-1S excels for photographers wanting to tailor their kit to specific styles or projects - portrait bokeh, wildlife telephoto reach, or macro detail. The W350’s fixed lens is simply more convenient but less versatile.
Battery Life and Storage: Powering Your Shoot
The GX-1S uses four AA batteries, a mixed blessing depending on your perspective. AAs are easy to source worldwide, but compared to modern rechargeable packs, they add weight and bulk - not ideal for extensive travel without spares. Battery life is moderate, enough for a day of shooting but less efficient than today’s DSLRs.
The Sony W350 utilizes a proprietary NP-BN1 rechargeable lithium-ion battery. While smaller in capacity, it lasts surprisingly well given the power demands of a compact camera. Plus, the smaller physical size aids portability.
Both cameras have one card slot, supporting legacy storage types: SD/MMC for Samsung and Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo or internal storage for Sony.
Durability and Weather Resistance: Should You Worry?
Neither camera boasts weather sealing, dustproofing, or shockproofing - typical for their class and era. The GX-1S’s DSLR body has robust plastic construction but not much more. The W350, built for pocket portability, is lighter and less rugged.
If you plan outdoor adventures with exposure to harsh conditions, consider protective gear or newer models with environmental sealing.
Specialty Photography Performance Breakdown
Let’s dive into how both cameras perform across popular photography styles, taking into account their design and specs.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh
The GX-1S’s APS-C sensor and interchangeable lenses let you create creamy bokeh and excellent skin tone reproduction. Pentax K lenses can be sharp with natural rendition, while the DSLR’s manual controls help sculpt exposure precisely.
The Sony W350’s small sensor and fixed zoom struggle with shallow depth-of-field effects, producing images where backgrounds tend to be more in focus. Skin tones can look slightly flat under challenging lighting, but in bright, natural light, it manages decent snapshots.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution
With its larger sensor and slightly lower pixel count, the Samsung offers better dynamic range and noise control, important for capturing nuanced skies and shadow detail.
The Sony’s higher resolution seems attractive on paper but its small sensor limits true detail and tonal latitude. Landscapes are fine for casual sharing but not top-level prints.
Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus Speed and Burst
The GX-1S’s phase-detection AF and 3 fps burst make it possible to capture modest action scenes. While modest by modern standards, it’s still superior to the Sony.
The W350’s slow autofocus and single-frame shooting make it ill-suited for fast-moving subjects.
Street Photography: Discreteness and Agility
Sony’s tiny size and silence shine here. The W350 slips unnoticed in urban crowds, perfect for candid snaps. The Samsung’s DSLR heft and shutter sound make it conspicuous but offer better image control.
Macro Photography: Focusing Precision and Magnification
The GX-1S with a macro lens shines here, offering precise focus control and superior image quality. The W350’s fixed lens reaches down to 10cm but lacks true macro sharpness.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure Control
The GX-1S can shoot up to ISO 3200, though noise increases substantially beyond ISO 800. Its manual shutter speeds down to 30 seconds allow long exposures necessary for astrophotography - a distinct advantage.
Sony’s maximum shutter speed of 2 seconds and noisier high-ISO images limit night shooting potential.
Video Capabilities: More than a Still Camera?
Samsung’s DSLR has no video recording functionality. The Sony W350 offers HD video at 720p/30fps in Motion JPEG format - basic but a bonus for casual movies.
Travel Photography: Versatility and Power
For travelers, the Sony W350 is ideal: ultra-portable, versatile zoom, easy-to-use auto modes, and decent battery life. The Samsung, though capable of superior image quality, demands more gear and planning.
Professional Use: Workflow and Reliability
Samsung’s support for raw files and compatibility with Pentax’s full lens lineup makes it more attractive for serious photographers wanting post-processing flexibility.
Sony’s JPEG-only output and simpler controls place it firmly in amateur territory.
Image Gallery: Real-World Samples from Both Cameras
To visualize these points, here are side-by-side shots from the Samsung GX-1S and Sony W350 under varied conditions - portraits, landscapes, close-ups.
Look for texture rendition on the Samsung’s images and how Sony’s sharper but noisier files handle shadows.
Summarizing the Performance: Scores Speak Volumes
Based on my testing metrics across image quality, autofocus, versatility, ergonomics, and usability, here’s how these two stack up overall.
Samsung’s DSLR is clearly the better all-round camera, with significant advantages in image quality, lens flexibility, and control. Sony’s compact wins for portability and simplicity.
Genre-Specific Strengths: Who Excels Where?
Let’s finish by breaking down each camera’s strong points across photography genres:
- Samsung GX-1S: Best for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, macro, and professional workflows.
- Sony W350: Outstanding for street and travel photography requiring minimal fuss and instant snapshots.
- Both: Limited video features, not ideal for advanced cinematography.
Final Recommendations: Matching Cameras to Your Needs and Budget
-
Choose the Samsung GX-1S if:
You value image quality, want full manual control, plan to expand your lens collection, and shoot various genres including portraits, landscapes, or sports. Ideal for enthusiasts and semi-professionals on a budget who don’t mind heavier gear and no video. -
Choose the Sony W350 if:
You prioritize compactness, ease of use, and travel-friendly convenience. If you mostly shoot casual snapshots, street photos, or family events with good light and want simple video capability, this camera fits well.
Closing Thoughts: Experience Informs Expectations
Having spent hundreds of hours with DSLRs and compacts alike, I find that no camera is universally superior - it all boils down to your style, subjects, and shooting conditions. The Samsung GX-1S is a classic beginner-to-enthusiast DSLR experience: larger sensor, manual engagement, and optics that reward learning photographers. The Sony W350 is a practical, no-frills companion for quick shots on the go.
I hope this detailed comparison helps you understand not just the numbers, but what it feels like to operate and shoot with these two cameras. Remember, choice is about capturing your vision comfortably and consistently.
Happy shooting!
If you have questions on any specific feature or want a hands-on video walk-through, feel free to ask. Meanwhile, I encourage you to try both before buying if possible - nothing beats first-person experience.
End of Review
Samsung GX-1S vs Sony W350 Specifications
Samsung GX-1S | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung GX-1S | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Released | 2006-01-16 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3008 x 2008 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Pentax KAF | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 210 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 605 grams (1.33 pounds) | 117 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $850 | $200 |