Samsung GX-20 vs Sony T99
58 Imaging
52 Features
52 Overall
52
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Released January 2008
- Succeeded the Samsung GX-10
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Released July 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung GX-20 vs Sony T99 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Samsung GX-20 vs Sony T99, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the GX-20 (15MP) and the T99 (14MP) is very comparable but the GX-20 (APS-C) and T99 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe GX-20 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the T99 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the GX-20 grades against the T99 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung GX-20 vs Sony T99 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung GX-20 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung GX-20 Gallery & Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Sony T99
| GX-20 | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Samsung GX-20
| T99 | GX-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 | January 2008 | Newer by 29 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung GX-20 and Sony T99
| GX-20 | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung GX-20 features physical dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) and the Sony T99 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Samsung GX-20 vs Sony T99 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the GX-20 and the T99.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GX-20 and T99 is 58 and 96 respectively.
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GX-20 and T99.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GX-20 using its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Samsung GX-20 will show greater detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged GX-20 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony T99 Specifications
| Samsung GX-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung GX-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2008-01-24 | 2010-07-08 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.4 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 365.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 15MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4688 x 3120 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 151 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1250s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 800g (1.76 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 68 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 714 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC/SDHC card | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $850 | $179 |