Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290
58 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5098/a50987fbe1d3aed59d1942e6a355078ee6cfb4f2" alt="Samsung GX-20 front Samsung GX-20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d96a4/d96a4c1bcc30cd9229b2c3dc388d3661d2de7d1f" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 front"
94 Imaging
34 Features
28 Overall
31
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Introduced January 2008
- Succeeded the Samsung GX-10
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Samsung GX-20 and Sony W290, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the GX-20 (15MP) and W290 (12MP) and the GX-20 (APS-C) and W290 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The GX-20 was introduced 13 months before the W290 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W290 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the GX-20 grades vs the W290 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung GX-20 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290. The whole galleries are available at Samsung GX-20 Gallery & Sony W290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Sony W290
GX-20 | W290 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Samsung GX-20
W290 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2009 | ![]() | January 2008 | Fresher by 13 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Samsung GX-20 and Sony W290
GX-20 | W290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Samsung GX-20 enjoys external measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Sony W290 has dimensions of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung GX-20 and Sony W290 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the GX-20 against the W290.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7dc3/f7dc3856fe4c1a22d660e78ca2204c458beaa8ec" alt="Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 size comparison Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GX-20 and W290 is 58 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5270d/5270da94379e6f4e5f21600c40e509f0f85f0424" alt="Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 top view buttons comparison Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at technical specs. The visual below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GX-20 and W290.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GX-20 having a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung GX-20 will resolve more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The older GX-20 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9939f/9939f2e955a45732351ffe6b2c8eed9391c5c70e" alt="Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 sensor size comparison Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 sensor size comparison"
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6001/f6001e69e4727cb64e755d095c8c6fc927a40018" alt="Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung GX-20 vs Sony W290 Specifications
Samsung GX-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung GX-20 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2008-01-24 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.4 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 365.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4688 x 3120 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 151 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800g (1.76 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 68 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 714 | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $850 | $230 |