Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Previous Model is Sigma SD1
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the Galaxy Camera 2 (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty comparable but the Galaxy Camera 2 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Galaxy Camera 2 was unveiled 22 months after the SD1 Merrill which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Galaxy Camera 2 matches up vs the SD1 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The full galleries are provided at Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
Galaxy Camera 2 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | April 2012 | Newer by 22 months | |
Screen dimensions | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
SD1 Merrill | Galaxy Camera 2 |
---|
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
Galaxy Camera 2 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 features external dimensions of 133mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") along with a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Examine the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Galaxy Camera 2 compared to the SD1 Merrill.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Galaxy Camera 2 and SD1 Merrill is 90 and 57 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The picture here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera 2 and SD1 Merrill.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Galaxy Camera 2 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 will provide extra detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern Galaxy Camera 2 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2014-01-02 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos | Dual True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 4.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 283 gr (0.62 pounds) | 790 gr (1.74 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $400 | $2,339 |