Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL102
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Samsung. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Galaxy Camera 3G was launched 3 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Galaxy Camera 3G matches up vs the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are available at Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Samsung SL102
| Galaxy Camera 3G | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 45 months |
| Display dimension | 4.8" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+2.3") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| SL102 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Samsung SL102
| Galaxy Camera 3G | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G offers outer dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the Galaxy Camera 3G vs the SL102.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Galaxy Camera 3G and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The image underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera 3G and SL102.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer Galaxy Camera 3G provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternate name | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-08-29 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | - | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 4.8 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 0k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $606 | $130 |