Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sigma SD9
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Released August 2012
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sigma SD9, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Samsung and Sigma. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Galaxy Camera 3G was brought out 9 years after the SD9 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Galaxy Camera 3G matches up vs the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are available at Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Sigma SD9
Galaxy Camera 3G | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | November 2002 | More modern by 119 months | |
Display size | 4.8" | 1.8" | Larger display (+3") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
SD9 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 130k | 0k | Clearer display (+130k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sigma SD9
Galaxy Camera 3G | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G enjoys exterior measurements of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check out the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Galaxy Camera 3G vs the SD9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Galaxy Camera 3G and SD9 is 90 and 54 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Galaxy Camera 3G and SD9.
As you can see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Galaxy Camera 3G due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G will give you more detail having its extra 13MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Galaxy Camera 3G should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2012-08-29 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 3MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | - | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 4.8" | 1.8" |
Screen resolution | 0k dot | 130k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/6000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 305 grams (0.67 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $606 | $3,001 |