Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A300
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released January 2008
- Successor is Sony A330
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A300 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G versus Sony A300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Galaxy Camera 3G was unveiled 4 years after the A300 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Galaxy Camera 3G grades against the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The full galleries are available at Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Sony A300
Galaxy Camera 3G | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2012 | January 2008 | Newer by 56 months | |
Display size | 4.8" | 2.7" | Larger display (+2.1") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
A300 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony A300
Galaxy Camera 3G | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G comes with physical dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Compare the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G versus Sony A300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Galaxy Camera 3G and the A300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Galaxy Camera 3G and A300 is 90 and 64 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera 3G and A300.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Galaxy Camera 3G having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G will deliver greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Galaxy Camera 3G provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A300 Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2012-08-29 | 2008-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Peak resolution | - | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 4.8" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 0k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 305g (0.67 pounds) | 632g (1.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | Compact Flash |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $606 | $0 |